Global EV Comparison: Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €46000. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €30890 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €46000 | - Price Europe (New) |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €30890 |
| GCC Score | 6.8 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 505 km | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | 568 km | 425 km |
| Range (GCC) | 489 km | 366 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 73.1 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 69 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 14.1 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.09 km/kWh | 5.46 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.1 | 6.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.3 | 6.1 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 165 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 221 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 269 Nm | 330 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4690 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1860 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2025 kg | 2030 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 452 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 6.7 |
