Global EV Comparison: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) has a starting price of €54950, compared to the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…), which starts at €56500.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-… | 2023-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Mexico |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | €54950 | €56500 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €42790 | €34900 |
| GCC Score | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Range and Efficiency
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…).
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 402 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 562 km | 470 km |
| Range (GCC) | 453 km | 391 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 82 kWh | 75 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 77 kWh | 72.6 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | 18.6 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.88 km/kWh | 5.39 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.7 | 6.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) maxes out at 135 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 135 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Performance
Both vehicles are rear-wheel drive.
Although the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) has more power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 210 kW | 197 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 282 hp | 264 hp |
| Motor Torque | 545 Nm | 525 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7 s | 5.9 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Dimensions
The Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…).
The Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4588 mm | 4713 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2108 mm | 2097 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1865 mm | 1881 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1624 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2984 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…), but the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) doesn’t have one.
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 (2023-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2023-…).
| Property | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2145 kg | 2084 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 535 l | 402 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1460 l | 1420 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 100 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1000 kg | 750 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.5 | 7 |