Global EV Comparison: Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD vs BMW iX M60 xDrive
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in Europe. The BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €111765 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2022-2025 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Mexico | Germany |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €111765 |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) has a larger battery, the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 488 km | 476 km |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 566 km |
| Range (GCC) | 464 km | 461 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 106 kWh | 111.5 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 102 kWh | 108.6 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 22 kWh/100 km | 23.6 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.55 km/kWh | 4.24 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.3 | 5.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 195 kW, while the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) maxes out at 190 kW.
The Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11.5 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 190 kW | 195 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 7.5 | 7.3 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Although the BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) has more power, the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 458 kW | 462 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 615 hp | 620 hp |
| Motor Torque | 881 Nm | 1100 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.8 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Performance Score | 6.7 | 7.5 |
Dimensions
The BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...).
The Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4883 mm | 4953 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2197 mm | 2230 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1982 mm | 1967 mm |
| Height | 1651 mm | 1696 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3094 mm | 3000 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...) features a larger trunk, but the BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The BMW iX M60 xDrive (2022-2025) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD (2024-...).
| Property | Chevrolet Blazer EV Performance AWD | BMW iX M60 xDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2599 kg | 2659 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 722 l | 500 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1674 l | 1750 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1588 kg | 2500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.6 | 8.3 |