Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQT Long vs Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) has a starting price of €41613, compared to the Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...), which starts at €58040.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | France | France |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €41613 | €58040 |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 5.3 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) has a larger battery, the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 266 km | 223 km |
| Range (GCC) | 227 km | 191 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 48 kWh | 50 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 45 kWh | 46.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 19.8 kWh/100 km | 24.2 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.04 km/kWh | 4.13 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.4 | 2.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 80 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 5.4 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 90 kW | 100 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 121 hp | 134 hp |
| Motor Torque | 245 Nm | 260 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 13.3 s | 10.8 s |
| Top Speed | 132 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.8 | 2.3 |
Dimensions
The Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) is wider and taller, but about the same length as the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
The Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4922 mm | 4981 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2159 mm | 2204 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1859 mm | 1924 mm |
| Height | 1811 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 3275 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh (2024-...).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Toyota Proace Verso Electric L1 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 7 | 5, 7, 8, 9 |
| Curb Weight | 1944 kg | 1943 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 828 l | 550 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 3200 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 1000 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.6 | 8.8 |
