Global EV Comparison: Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh vs Mercedes EQT Long
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) has a starting price of €46230, compared to the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…), which starts at €41613.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | France, Turkey, UK | France |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €46230 | €41613 |
| GCC Score | 5.2 | 5.6 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) has a larger battery, the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 223 km | 266 km |
| Range (GCC) | 191 km | 227 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 50 kWh | 48 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 46.3 kWh | 45 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 24.2 kWh/100 km | 19.8 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.13 km/kWh | 5.04 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 2.8 | 4.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 101 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 101 kW | 80 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.4 | 6.7 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 100 kW | 90 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 134 hp | 121 hp |
| Motor Torque | 270 Nm | 245 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
| Top Speed | 130 km/h | 132 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Dimensions
The Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) is wider and taller, but about the same length as the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
The Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4983 mm | 4922 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2204 mm | 2159 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1920 mm | 1859 mm |
| Height | 1890 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3275 mm | 3100 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh (2024-...).
| Property | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | 7 |
| Curb Weight | 2027 kg | 1944 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 603 l | 828 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 3968 l | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1000 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 8.9 | 7.6 |
