Global EV Comparison: Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh vs Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) has a starting price of €46000, compared to the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…), which starts at €45000.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | France |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €46000 | €45000 |
| GCC Score | 6.8 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 505 km | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | 568 km | 681 km |
| Range (GCC) | 489 km | 579 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 73.1 kWh | 101 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 69 kWh | 96.9 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 14.1 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.09 km/kWh | 5.98 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.1 | 9.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) maxes out at 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 160 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.3 | 6.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) has more power, the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 165 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 221 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 269 Nm | 345 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.8 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is wider and taller, but about the same length as the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4690 mm | 4652 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2108 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1860 mm | 1936 mm |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1692 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2795 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2025 kg | 2246 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 452 l | 565 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1668 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1200 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 7.3 |
