Global EV Comparison: Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD vs Mercedes EQB 250+
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €53514. Although the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) has been announced, it is not yet in production and will not be available for sale in Europe.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2023-… |
| Current Status | Announced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Hungary |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €53514 |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €35270 |
| GCC Score | 6 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 404 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 455 km | 536 km |
| Range (GCC) | 387 km | 419 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 57.7 kWh | 73.9 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 51.9 kWh | 70.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.46 km/kWh | 5.94 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 8 | 7.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) maxes out at 100 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) has more power, the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | IM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 123 kW | 140 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 165 hp | 188 hp |
| Motor Torque | 228 Nm | 385 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3 | 3.5 |
Dimensions
The Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…).
The Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4520 mm | 4684 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2020 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1870 mm | 1834 mm |
| Height | 1595 mm | 1667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2829 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQB 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 7 |
| Curb Weight | - Curb Weight | 2105 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 416 l | 495 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1710 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1400 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 7.4 |
