Global EV Comparison: Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric vs Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €46000. The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €31590 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-2022 | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Belgium | Japan, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €46000 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €31590 | - Price Europe (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.1 | 6.8 |
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022).
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 505 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 438 km | 568 km |
| Range (GCC) | 373 km | 489 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 69 kWh | 73.1 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 67 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 18 kWh/100 km | 14.1 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.57 km/kWh | 7.09 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.4 | 9.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.1 | 6.3 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 170 kW | 165 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 228 hp | 221 hp |
| Motor Torque | 330 Nm | 269 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Dimensions
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022).
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4440 mm | 4690 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2034 mm | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1873 mm | 1860 mm |
| Height | 1596 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2702 mm | 2850 mm |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022), but the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh (2025-…).
| Property | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 73 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 1970 kg | 2025 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 404 l | 452 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1205 l | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 750 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.4 | 6.9 |
