Global EV Comparison: Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric vs Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €45000. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €30890 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-2022 | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Belgium | France |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €45000 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €30890 | - Price Europe (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.1 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 425 km | 681 km |
| Range (GCC) | 366 km | 579 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 69 kWh | 101 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 67 kWh | 96.9 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.46 km/kWh | 5.98 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 9.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) maxes out at 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 160 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.1 | 6.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 170 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 228 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 330 Nm | 345 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.8 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4425 mm | 4652 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2034 mm | 2108 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1873 mm | 1936 mm |
| Height | 1652 mm | 1692 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2702 mm | 2795 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…).
| Property | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2030 kg | 2246 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 410 l | 565 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1295 l | 1668 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 1200 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.7 | 7.3 |
