USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model S 85
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) for as low as $9500, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2023 | 2012-2016 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Netherlands, USA |
| Body Style | SUV | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $9500 |
| GCC Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 265 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 268 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 226 mi | 243 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 85 kWh | 85 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 80 kWh | 80.8 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi | 33.3 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.83 mi/kWh | 3.01 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 5.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 10 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 10 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 112 kW | 120 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla (NACS) |
| Charging Score | 5.8 | 6.1 |
Performance
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), IM (rear) | IM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 278 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 373 hp |
| Motor Torque | 561 lb-ft | 325 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 140 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.7 | 5.4 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 187.5 in | 195.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.5 in | 86.2 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 74.2 in | 77.3 in |
| Height | 63.9 in | 56.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.1 in | 116.5 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 5500 lb | 4630 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 17.7 ft3 | 26.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 51.6 ft3 | 58.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 2.1 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 5.5 |
