USA EV Comparison: BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah vs Honda e Advance
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) for as low as $8989, while the Honda e Advance (2020-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Hatchback.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2017-2018 | 2020-2023 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | Japan |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price USA (Used) | $8989 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5 | 4.7 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Honda e Advance (2020-2023) has a larger battery, the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 114 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 138 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 124 mi | 117 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 33.2 kWh | 35.5 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 27.2 kWh | 28.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.9 kWh/100 mi | 24.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.56 mi/kWh | 4.11 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 5.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 50 kW, while the Honda e Advance (2020-2023) maxes out at 46 kW.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 7.4 kW, whereas the Honda e Advance (2020-2023) is limited to 6.6 kW.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 6.6 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 46 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4 | 3.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are rear-wheel drive.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 113 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 152 hp |
| Motor Torque | 184 lb-ft | 232 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 s | 8 s |
| Top Speed | 93 mph | 90 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Dimensions
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Honda e Advance (2020-2023).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 157.9 in | 153.3 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 80.3 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 69.9 in | 69 in |
| Height | 62.9 in | 59.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.2 in | 99.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Honda e Advance |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Curb Weight | 2961 lb | 3516 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 9.2 ft3 | 6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 38.8 ft3 | 30.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.3 | 3.8 |
