USA EV Comparison: Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | France | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 423 mi | 264 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 360 mi | 227 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 101 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 96.9 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26.9 kWh/100 mi | 29.5 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.72 mi/kWh | 3.39 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.1 | 6.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) maxes out at 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 160 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.9 | 6.1 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 170 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 228 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 254 lb-ft | 243 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 105 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 183.1 in | 174.2 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 83 in | 80.1 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 76.2 in | 73.7 in |
| Height | 66.6 in | 65 in |
| Wheelbase | 110 in | 106.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range (2025-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Citroën C5 Aircross Long Range | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4951 lb | 4475 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 20 ft3 | 16 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 58.9 ft3 | 57.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.1 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | 2645 lb | 2000 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.3 | 6.7 |
