USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQE 350 vs Xiaomi SU7 Pro
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Sedan.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-2023 | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | China |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023).
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 386 mi | 410 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 313 mi | 349 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 98 kWh | 99.3 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 89 kWh | 94.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 28.4 kWh/100 mi | 27 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.52 mi/kWh | 3.7 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 8.2 | 9 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 190 kW, while the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) maxes out at 170 kW.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 170 kW | 190 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.5 | 7 |
Performance
Both vehicles are rear-wheel drive.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 215 kW | 220 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 288 hp | 295 hp |
| Motor Torque | 417 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1 s | 5.5 s |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 131 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.1 | 4.9 |
Dimensions
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.
The Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.7 in | 196.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.8 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 75 in | 77.3 in |
| Height | 59.2 in | 57.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 122.8 in | 118.1 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 350 | Xiaomi SU7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 5302 lb | 4608 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 15.2 ft3 | 18.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 31.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 3.7 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.5 | 5.3 |
