USA EV Comparison: MG ZS EV Long Range vs Škoda Enyaq 60
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-… | 2023-2024 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | China, Indonesia, India | Czech Republic |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 5.8 | 6 |
Range and Efficiency
While the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024).
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 249 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 232 mi | 216 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 72.6 kWh | 62 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 68.3 kWh | 58 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 29.4 kWh/100 mi | 26.9 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.4 mi/kWh | 3.72 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.3 | 6.5 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 124 kW, while the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) maxes out at 94 kW.
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 94 kW | 124 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4.8 | 5.7 |
Performance
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) is rear-wheel drive, while the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) offers a front-wheel drive system.
Although the Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) has more power, the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 115 kW | 132 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 154 hp | 177 hp |
| Motor Torque | 207 lb-ft | 229 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
| Top Speed | 109 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Dimensions
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) is longer and wider, but the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…) is taller.
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 170.2 in | 183 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 84.6 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 71.2 in | 74 in |
| Height | 64.9 in | 63.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.6 in | 108.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Škoda Enyaq 60 (2023-2024) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the MG ZS EV Long Range (2021-…).
| Property | MG ZS EV Long Range | Škoda Enyaq 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 3737 lb | 4391 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 15.8 ft3 | 20.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 41.2 ft3 | 60.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1102 lb | 2204 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 7 |
