USA EV Comparison: Xiaomi SU7 Pro vs Mercedes EQE 350
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Sedan.
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2022-2023 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | China | Germany, China |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 6.6 |
Range and Efficiency
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023).
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 410 mi | 386 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 349 mi | 313 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 99.3 kWh | 98 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 94.3 kWh | 89 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 27 kWh/100 mi | 28.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.7 mi/kWh | 3.52 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9 | 8.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 190 kW, while the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) maxes out at 170 kW.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 190 kW | 170 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 7 | 6.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are rear-wheel drive.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 220 kW | 215 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 295 hp | 288 hp |
| Motor Torque | 295 lb-ft | 417 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 130 mph |
| Performance Score | 4.9 | 5.1 |
Dimensions
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.
The Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 196.7 in | 194.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 82.8 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 77.3 in | 75 in |
| Height | 57.3 in | 59.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 122.8 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Xiaomi SU7 Pro (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQE 350 (2022-2023) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Xiaomi SU7 Pro | Mercedes EQE 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4608 lb | 5302 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 18.3 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 31.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 3.7 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.3 | 5.5 |
