Global EV Comparison: Acura ZDX Type S AWD vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) has a starting price of €91700, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) is not sold in Europe.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | USA | USA |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €91700 |
| GCC Score | 6.9 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 447 km | 499 km |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 585 km |
| Range (GCC) | 425 km | 486 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 106 kWh | 111 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 102 kWh | 107 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 24 kWh/100 km | 22 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.17 km/kWh | 4.54 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.2 | 6.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11.5 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 190 kW | 250 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 372 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 499 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 737 Nm | 770 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.9 s |
| Top Speed | 211 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 6.3 | 5.6 |
Dimensions
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5022 mm | 5037 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2113 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1955 mm | 1964 mm |
| Height | 1637 mm | 1744 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3094 mm | 2985 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 6, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 2745 kg | 2779 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 840 l | 365 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1785 l | 1915 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 37 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1587 kg | 2200 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 8 | 8.7 |
