USA EV Comparison: Acura ZDX Type S AWD vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) has a starting price of $73500, compared to the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…), which starts at $81290.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | USA | USA |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | $73500 | $81290 |
| Price USA (Used) | $57400 | $85999 |
| GCC Score | 6.9 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 278 mi | 310 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 364 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 264 mi | 302 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 106 kWh | 111 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 102 kWh | 107 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 38.6 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.59 mi/kWh | 2.82 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.2 | 6.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11.5 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 190 kW | 250 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 372 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 499 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 544 lb-ft | 568 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3 s | 5.7 s |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 112 mph |
| Performance Score | 6.3 | 5.6 |
Dimensions
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 197.7 in | 198.3 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 83.2 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 77 in | 77.3 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 68.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 121.8 in | 117.5 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Acura ZDX Type S AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 6, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 6052 lb | 6127 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 29.7 ft3 | 12.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 63 ft3 | 67.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.6 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 lb | 4850 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 8 | 8.7 |
