USA EV Comparison: Volvo EX90 Twin Motor vs Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) has a starting price of $81290, compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…), which starts at $73500.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | USA | USA |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | USA |
| Price USA (New) | $81290 | $73500 |
| Price USA (Used) | $85999 | $57400 |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 310 mi | 278 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 364 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 302 mi | 264 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 111 kWh | 106 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 107 kWh | 102 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi | 38.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.82 mi/kWh | 2.59 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.6 | 5.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11.5 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 250 kW | 190 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 7.6 | 7.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 372 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 499 hp |
| Motor Torque | 568 lb-ft | 544 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7 s | 4.3 s |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 131 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.6 | 6.3 |
Dimensions
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 198.3 in | 197.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 83.2 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 77.3 in | 77 in |
| Height | 68.7 in | 64.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 117.5 in | 121.8 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).
| Property | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Acura ZDX Type S AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5, 6, 7 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 6127 lb | 6052 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 12.9 ft3 | 29.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 67.6 ft3 | 63 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 4850 lb | 3500 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 8.7 | 8 |
