Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ vs Tesla Model S Dual Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) has a starting price of €110705, compared to the Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…), which starts at €94990.
The Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is a Sedan, whereas the Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-… | 2021-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | USA |
| Body Style | Sedan | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | €110705 | €94990 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €64990 | €71990 |
| GCC Score | 6.1 | 7.6 |
Range and Efficiency
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 370 km | 647 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 504 km | 649 km |
| Range (GCC) | 390 km | 579 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 100 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 90.6 kWh | 95 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 23.2 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.3 km/kWh | 6.09 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 9.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) maxes out at 170 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 170 kW | 250 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 (Tesla) |
| Charging Score | 6.6 | 7.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 460 kW | 500 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 617 hp | 670 hp |
| Motor Torque | 950 Nm | - Motor Torque |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.2 s |
| Top Speed | 220 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Performance Score | 7.2 | 7.4 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.
The Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4964 mm | 5021 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2103 mm | 2189 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1906 mm | 1987 mm |
| Height | 1495 mm | 1431 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3120 mm | 2960 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…), but the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) doesn’t have one.
The Tesla Model S Dual Motor (2021-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Tesla Model S Dual Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2540 kg | 2068 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 430 l | 709 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 895 l | 1739 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 89 l |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1600 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.6 | 6.1 |