Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQT Standard vs Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) has a starting price of €39623, compared to the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…), which starts at €35999.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | France | Romania |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €39623 | €35999 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €26850 | - Price Europe (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5.9 | 5.7 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 282 km | 288 km |
| Range (GCC) | 244 km | 242 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 48 kWh | 54 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 45 kWh | 43.6 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 18.4 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.42 km/kWh | 5.55 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 5.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 80 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 5.4 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 90 kW | 100 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 121 hp | 134 hp |
| Motor Torque | 245 Nm | 290 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 12.6 s | 11 s |
| Top Speed | 132 km/h | 145 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.9 | 2.5 |
Dimensions
The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4498 mm | 4337 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2159 mm | 2076 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1859 mm | 1876 mm |
| Height | 1819 mm | 1817 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2716 mm | 2692 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…), but the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) doesn’t have one.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Ford e-Tourneo Courier (2024-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Base |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 1874 kg | 1650 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 551 l | 570 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1979 l | 2162 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 44 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 750 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.5 | 7.6 |
