Global EV Comparison: Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD vs Škoda Enyaq RS
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) has a starting price of €58600, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is not sold in Europe.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Czech Republic |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €58600 |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 7.2 |
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 330 km | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 562 km |
| Range (GCC) | 314 km | 481 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 66 kWh | 84 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 63 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 20.1 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.98 km/kWh | 6.09 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 8.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 185 kW, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) maxes out at 130 kW.
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 130 kW | 185 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4.6 | 6.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | EESM (front), EESM (rear) | IM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 250 kW | 250 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 335 hp | 335 hp |
| Motor Torque | 560 Nm | 679 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.5 s |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Dimensions
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4595 mm | 4660 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2172 mm | 2148 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1850 mm | 1879 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1607 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2775 mm | 2769 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2090 kg | 2236 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 408 l | 585 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1280 l | 1710 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 1200 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.8 | 7 |
