USA EV Comparison: Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD vs Škoda Enyaq RS
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a starting price of $43590, while the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) is not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Czech Republic |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU |
| Price USA (New) | $43590 | - Price USA (New) |
| Price USA (Used) | $18500 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 7.2 |
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 205 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 349 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 195 mi | 299 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 66 kWh | 84 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 63 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi | 26.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.1 mi/kWh | 3.78 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 8.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 185 kW, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) maxes out at 130 kW.
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 130 kW | 185 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4.6 | 6.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | EESM (front), EESM (rear) | IM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 250 kW | 250 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 335 hp | 335 hp |
| Motor Torque | 413 lb-ft | 501 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
| Top Speed | 124 mph | 112 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Dimensions
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 180.9 in | 183.5 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 85.5 in | 84.6 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 72.8 in | 74 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 63.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 109 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) features a larger trunk, but the Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Škoda Enyaq RS (2025-...) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD | Škoda Enyaq RS |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4608 lb | 4929 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 22.8 ft3 | 20.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 59.7 ft3 | 60.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 lb | 2645 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.8 | 7 |
