Global EV Comparison: Škoda Citigo-e iV vs Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) for as low as €10990, while the Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) begins at €3450.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Hatchback.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2021 | 2012-2016 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Slovakia | France |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (Used) | €10990 | €3450 |
| GCC Score | 4.4 | 5 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016).
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 257 km | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 218 km | 158 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 36.8 kWh | 25.9 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 32.3 kWh | 23.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 6.75 km/kWh | 6.78 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) has no DC fast charging capability, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) can charge at up to 40 kW.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 43 kW, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 43 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 40 kW | - Max Charging Power (DC) |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Type 2 (Mennekes) |
| Charging Score | 3.9 | 5.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) has more power, the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 61 kW | 65 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 82 hp | 87 hp |
| Motor Torque | 212 Nm | 220 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 12.3 s | 13.5 s |
| Top Speed | 130 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Dimensions
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3597 mm | 4084 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 1945 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1645 mm | 1730 mm |
| Height | 1481 mm | 1562 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2422 mm | 2588 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in in the EU.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 1235 kg | 1468 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 250 l | 338 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 923 l | 1225 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 3.6 | 4.2 |
