Test: Audi Q4 e-tron 45 Quattro

Uploaded 1 year ago by Norsk elbilforening

Video Summary

-The Audi Q4 e-tron has been upgraded with a more powerful motor and faster charging capabilities.
- The vehicle now pre-warms the battery prior to charging and features better adaptive cruise control.
- Externally, the car's appearance remains the same, except for the model emblem; the new models are 45 and 55, and the 35 model has been removed from the program in Norway.
- The tester called this version of the vehicle “the pretty little sister”.
- The car's exterior is nearly identical to the Skoda Enyaq and Volkswagen ID.4.
- For 499,000 kroner, you can get the “45 quattro,” or four-wheel-drive version of the vehicle; for the price, you can get the same as a rear-wheel-drive Enyaq.
- There are simple cloth seats with manually adjustable cushions, backs, and height on both the driver and passenger sides.
- The seats are electrically heated, but the steering wheel is not heated, unless you upgrade to the Edition Pro.
- The car has simple interior decorating with matte black plastic, but the matte black plastic was a good choice so there is no shiny plastic.
- The screen, which features the drive select functions, is not the same as the one in Volkswagens and Skodas, but is much quicker.
- The instrument panel is very good, but infotainment is not the most intuitive and can be a little too cluttered.
- The gear shifter is the same as the Skoda Enyaq, and the Q4 features a multifunctional button.
- While the presenter liked this vehicle, other manufacturers do the battery pre-warming functionality better.
- Even though there are 2 isofix seats, the tester says the back is very simple and luxurious.
- The luggage compartment has 520 liters of space; with the floor removed, there is more space, but then a loading threshold is reached.
- The Q4 drives well, is comfortable and sporty, is as powerful as the ID.4 and Enyaq, is also very safe.
- With the update, the car now has 286 horsepower on its rear wheel drive, and has the speed boost of 180 Km per hour.
- On the route, the car went 1.65 kWh per miles and was not more energy efficient than a previous test.
- Overall, the navigation and voice commands are very bad, but the price of the car can be quite low during a campaign.

More Videos

Mentioned Cars

Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared