Video Summary
Performance and Range:The Škoda Enyaq 80X was driven for 335km on a full charge.
After driving at 120km/h for 24 minutes, average consumption is 21.6 kWh per 100km.
The driving experience in the Enyaq is nicer than in the Volkswagen ID.4.
Following the same test, the Škoda Enyaq 80X had an average consumption of 22.3 kWh per 100 km, providing a range of 335km.
The Volkswagen ID.4 GTX has an average consumption of 21.2 kWh per 100km, resulting in 352km of range, 17km more than the Enyaq.
Interior and Features:
The minimalist interior of the Volkswagen ID.4 is simplistic, with nice materials used on top of the doors and stitched dashboard, and is not sparse like a Tesla Model Y. However, Tesla's interior has nicer quality materials. The center console material is low quality, creating a mismatch between the steering wheel, switchgear, and materials.
In the Enyaq, the interior is higher quality, almost at an Audi level, with more layers. It is also user-friendly, intuitive, and luxurious.
Charging:
The Volkswagen ID.4 after an hour of driving without preconditioning was connected at 49% and peaked at 60kW charging speed. The Škoda Enyaq connected with 44% charge and peaked at 63kW.
Pros and Cons:
The Enyaq offers a superior user experience with higher interior quality, better ergonomics, and user-friendliness.
The Volkswagen ID.4 GTX is more efficient, offering better range.
Conclusion:
For actual real world driving use, the difference in the two vehicles is not very significant, but is a consideration on what the user is willing to compromise: range for interior quality.
