USA EV Comparison: Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro vs Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Years of Production 2022-… 2025-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture Belgium, China Czech Republic
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU EU
GCC Score 6.4 7.1

Range and Efficiency

Even though the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) has a larger battery, the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Range (WLTP) 314 mi 353 mi
Range (GCC) 249 mi 304 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 95 kWh 84 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 89 kWh 79 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 35.7 kWh/100 mi 26 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 2.8 mi/kWh 3.85 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.5 8.5

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 185 kW, while the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) maxes out at 155 kW.

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Max Charging Power (AC) 9.6 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 155 kW 185 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 1 CCS Type 2
Charging Score 6.4 6.8

Performance

Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.

Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Drive Type AWD AWD
Motor Type IM (front), IM (rear) IM (front), PMSM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 250 kW 250 kW
Motor Power (hp) 335 hp 335 hp
Motor Torque 490 lb-ft 501 lb-ft
0-60 mph 5.8 s 5.3 s
Top Speed 124 mph 112 mph
Performance Score 5.3 5.3

Dimensions

The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) is longer and wider, but about the same height as the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...).

The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Length 193.5 in 183.5 in
Width (with Mirrors) 86.2 in 84.6 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 76.3 in 74 in
Height 63.7 in 63.3 in
Wheelbase 115.3 in 109 in

Cargo and Towing

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…), but the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) doesn’t have one.

The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro (2022-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...).

Property Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 5390 lb 4936 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 18.6 ft3 20.1 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 55.3 ft3 56.9 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 2.2 ft3 - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity 4000 lb 2645 lb
Cargo and Towing Score 7.5 6.9
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared