Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
Property
Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh
Mercedes EQT Long
Years of Production
2024-… Years of Production
2024-… Years of Production
Current Status
Produced Current Status
Produced Current Status
Country of Manufacture
France, Turkey, UK Country of Manufacture
France Country of Manufacture
Body Style
Minivan Body Style
Minivan Body Style
Market Availability
EU Market Availability
EU Market Availability
GCC Score
5.6 GCC Score
5.6 GCC Score
Range and Efficiency
While the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
Property
Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh
Mercedes EQT Long
Range (WLTP)
218 mi Range (WLTP)
165 mi Range (WLTP)
Range (GCC)
186 mi Range (GCC)
141 mi Range (GCC)
Battery Capacity (Nominal)
75 kWh Battery Capacity (Nominal)
48 kWh Battery Capacity (Nominal)
Battery Capacity (Usable)
68 kWh Battery Capacity (Usable)
45 kWh Battery Capacity (Usable)
Efficiency per 100 mi
36.6 kWh/100 mi Efficiency per 100 mi
31.9 kWh/100 mi Efficiency per 100 mi
Efficiency per kWh
2.74 mi/kWh Efficiency per kWh
3.13 mi/kWh Efficiency per kWh
Range and Efficiency Score
4.1 Range and Efficiency Score
4.5 Range and Efficiency Score
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
Property
Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh
Mercedes EQT Long
Max Charging Power (AC)
11 kW Max Charging Power (AC)
22 kW Max Charging Power (AC)
Max Charging Power (DC)
100 kW Max Charging Power (DC)
80 kW Max Charging Power (DC)
Architecture
400 V Architecture
400 V Architecture
Charge Port
CCS Type 2 Charge Port
CCS Type 2 Charge Port
Charging Score
5.9 Charging Score
6.7 Charging Score
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) has more power, the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
Property
Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh
Mercedes EQT Long
Drive Type
FWD Drive Type
FWD Drive Type
Motor Type
PMSM Motor Type
PMSM Motor Type
Motor Power (kW)
100 kW Motor Power (kW)
90 kW Motor Power (kW)
Motor Power (hp)
134 hp Motor Power (hp)
121 hp Motor Power (hp)
Motor Torque
162 lb-ft Motor Torque
181 lb-ft Motor Torque
0-60 mph
13.7 s 0-60 mph
12.8 s 0-60 mph
Top Speed
81 mph Top Speed
82 mph Top Speed
Performance Score
1.7 Performance Score
1.8 Performance Score
Dimensions
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) is wider and taller, but about the same length as the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
Property
Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh
Mercedes EQT Long
Length
196.2 in Length
193.8 in Length
Width (with Mirrors)
86.8 in Width (with Mirrors)
85 in Width (with Mirrors)
Width (w/o Mirrors)
75.6 in Width (w/o Mirrors)
73.2 in Width (w/o Mirrors)
Height
74.4 in Height
71.3 in Height
Wheelbase
128.9 in Wheelbase
122 in Wheelbase
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh (2024-…).