USA EV Comparison: Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 vs Kia Niro EV Long Range
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) for as low as $12999, while the Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019) is a Hatchback, whereas the Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) is a SUV.
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2016-2019 | 2018-2022 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | France | South Korea |
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $12999 |
| GCC Score | 5.2 | 5.7 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019).
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 239 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 283 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 173 mi | 234 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 44.1 kWh | 67.5 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 41 kWh | 64 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 23.7 kWh/100 mi | 27.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.22 mi/kWh | 3.66 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019) has no DC fast charging capability, whereas the Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) can charge at up to 77 kW.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 43 kW, whereas the Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 43 kW | 7.2 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | - Max Charging Power (DC) | 77 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Type 2 (Mennekes) | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.2 | 4.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 65 kW | 150 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 87 hp | 201 hp |
| Motor Torque | 162 lb-ft | 291 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 12.7 s | 7.8 s |
| Top Speed | 84 mph | 104 mph |
| Performance Score | 1.7 | 3.8 |
Dimensions
The Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) is longer and wider, but about the same height as the Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 (2016-2019).
The Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 160.8 in | 172.2 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 76.6 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 68.1 in | 71.1 in |
| Height | 61.5 in | 61.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.9 in | 106.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Kia Niro EV Long Range (2018-2022) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Renault Zoe Z.E. 40 Q90 | Kia Niro EV Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 3263 lb | 3854 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 11.9 ft3 | 18.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 43.3 ft3 | 53 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.2 | 5.5 |
