USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQA 250 vs Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…) has a starting price of , while the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…) is not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Japan, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| GCC Score | 6.2 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 235 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 328 mi | 276 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 267 mi | 229 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 69.7 kWh | 57.7 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 66.5 kWh | 54 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 24.9 kWh/100 mi | 23.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.02 mi/kWh | 4.24 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 8 | 7.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…) maxes out at 112 kW.
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 112 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla (NACS) |
| Charging Score | 5.4 | 5.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-60 mph acceleration time, but the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | IM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 140 kW | 125 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 188 hp | 168 hp |
| Motor Torque | 284 lb-ft | 198 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 87 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Dimensions
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Mercedes EQA 250 (2023-…).
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 175.7 in | 184.6 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 79.5 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 72.2 in | 73.2 in |
| Height | 63.8 in | 65 in |
| Wheelbase | 107.4 in | 112.2 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) FWD 58 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4508 lb | 4057 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 12 ft3 | 27.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 46.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.4 | 6.9 |
