USA EV Comparison: Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD vs Mercedes EQA 250+
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2023-… |
| Current Status | Announced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Germany, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price USA (New) | $42000 | - Price USA (New) |
| GCC Score | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 235 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | 277 mi | 348 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 229 mi | 286 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 57.7 kWh | 73.9 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 51.9 kWh | 70.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 22.7 kWh/100 mi | 24.7 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.41 mi/kWh | 4.06 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.7 | 8.5 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…) maxes out at 112 kW.
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 112 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Tesla (NACS) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-60 mph acceleration time, but the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 123 kW | 140 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 165 hp | 188 hp |
| Motor Torque | 168 lb-ft | 284 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 3 | 3.5 |
Dimensions
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Mercedes EQA 250+ (2023-…).
The Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 184.6 in | 175.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 79.5 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 73.2 in | 72.2 in |
| Height | 65 in | 63.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 107.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Toyota bZ4X (bZ) 57.7 kWh FWD | Mercedes EQA 250+ |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4057 lb | 4530 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 27.7 ft3 | 12 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 46.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 6.4 |
