USA EV Comparison: Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD vs C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Announced |
| Country of Manufacture | India | Japan, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| GCC Score | 5.9 | 6 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a larger battery, the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 265 mi | 283 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 225 mi | 240 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 61.1 kWh | 57.7 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 59.8 kWh | 51.9 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26.6 kWh/100 mi | 21.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.76 mi/kWh | 4.62 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.8 | 8.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) maxes out at 55 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 55 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla (NACS) |
| Charging Score | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) has more power, the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 128 kW | 123 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 172 hp | 165 hp |
| Motor Torque | 142 lb-ft | 168 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
| Top Speed | 85 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 2.8 | 3 |
Dimensions
The Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) is longer and wider, but the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is taller.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168.7 in | 178 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 81.3 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 70.9 in | 73.6 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 62.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 108.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a towing capacity of up to 1654 lb, whereas the Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD (2025-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 57.7 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4045 lb | - Curb Weight |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 8.4 ft3 | 14.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 19.8 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1654 lb | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.2 | 6.3 |
