USA EV Comparison: BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah vs Rimac Nevera C_Two
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of . The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as $8989 on the used car market.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is a Hatchback, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is a Roadster.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2017-2018 | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | Croatia |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | USA |
| Price USA (Used) | $8989 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018).
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 114 mi | 305 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 304 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 124 mi | 274 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 33.2 kWh | 120 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 27.2 kWh | 114 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.9 kWh/100 mi | 41.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.56 mi/kWh | 2.4 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 4.9 |
Charging
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features an advanced 730-volt architecture, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 500 kW, while the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) maxes out at 50 kW.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 500 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 730 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 4 | 10 |
Performance
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 1427 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 1914 hp |
| Motor Torque | 184 lb-ft | 1726 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 s | 1.7 s |
| Top Speed | 93 mph | 256 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.2 | 8.9 |
Dimensions
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 157.9 in | 186.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 80.3 in | 80.8 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 69.9 in | - Width (w/o Mirrors) |
| Height | 62.9 in | 48.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.2 in | 108.1 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Curb Weight | 2961 lb | 5070 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 9.2 ft3 | 3.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 38.8 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.3 | 3.3 |
