Global EV Comparison: BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah vs Rimac Nevera C_Two
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in Europe. The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €14900 on the used car market.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is a Hatchback, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is a Roadster.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2017-2018 | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | Croatia |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | €14900 | - Price Europe (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018).
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 183 km | 491 km |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 490 km |
| Range (GCC) | 199 km | 441 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 33.2 kWh | 120 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 27.2 kWh | 114 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 13.7 kWh/100 km | 25.9 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.32 km/kWh | 3.87 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 4.9 |
Charging
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features an advanced 730-volt architecture, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 500 kW, while the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) maxes out at 50 kW.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 500 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 730 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4 | 10 |
Performance
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 1427 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 1914 hp |
| Motor Torque | 250 Nm | 2340 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3 s | 1.8 s |
| Top Speed | 150 km/h | 412 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.2 | 8.9 |
Dimensions
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4011 mm | 4745 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2039 mm | 2052 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1775 mm | - Width (w/o Mirrors) |
| Height | 1598 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2570 mm | 2745 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in in the EU.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Curb Weight | 1320 kg | 2300 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 260 l | 100 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1100 l | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.3 | 3.3 |
