USA EV Comparison: BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah vs Škoda Citigo-e iV
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) for as low as $8989, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Hatchback.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2017-2018 | 2019-2021 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | Slovakia |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price USA (Used) | $8989 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5 | 4.4 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018).
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 114 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 160 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 124 mi | 135 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 33.2 kWh | 36.8 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 27.2 kWh | 32.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.9 kWh/100 mi | 23.9 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.56 mi/kWh | 4.18 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 5.9 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 50 kW, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) maxes out at 40 kW.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 7.4 kW, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 7.2 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 40 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4 | 3.9 |
Performance
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is rear-wheel drive, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a front-wheel drive system.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 61 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 82 hp |
| Motor Torque | 184 lb-ft | 156 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 s | 11.8 s |
| Top Speed | 93 mph | 81 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.2 | 1.7 |
Dimensions
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) is longer, wider, and taller.
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 157.9 in | 141.6 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 80.3 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 69.9 in | 64.8 in |
| Height | 62.9 in | 58.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.2 in | 95.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
The BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah (2017-2018) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 94 Ah | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Curb Weight | 2961 lb | 2723 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 9.2 ft3 | 8.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 38.8 ft3 | 32.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.3 | 3.6 |
