USA EV Comparison: BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh vs Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) has a starting price of $39590, while the BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh (2025-…) is not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2021-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | China | Japan, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | - Price USA (New) | $39590 |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $16000 |
| GCC Score | 6.2 | 5.6 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) has a larger battery, the BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh (2025-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 216 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 261 mi | 251 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 222 mi | 206 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 64.8 kWh | 66 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 58 kWh | 63 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26.1 kWh/100 mi | 30.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.83 mi/kWh | 3.27 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.8 | 5.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 155 kW, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) maxes out at 130 kW.
The BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh (2025-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 7.2 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 155 kW | 130 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.1 | 4.7 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | EESM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 160 kW | 160 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 215 hp | 215 hp |
| Motor Torque | 229 lb-ft | 221 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 100 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Dimensions
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh (2025-…).
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 169.7 in | 180.9 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 81.1 in | 85.5 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 72 in | 72.8 in |
| Height | 65.9 in | 65.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 109.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD (2021-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | BYD Atto 2 64.8 kWh | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 3704 lb | 4323 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 14.1 ft3 | 22.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 47.3 ft3 | 59.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6 | 6.8 |
