USA EV Comparison: BYD Atto 3 FWD vs Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production. The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a starting price of $43590, while the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is not sold in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Years of Production 2022-… 2021-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture China Japan, China
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU USA
Price USA (New) - Price USA (New) $43590
Price USA (Used) - Price USA (Used) $18500
GCC Score 5.4 5.6

Range and Efficiency

Even though the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a larger battery, the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Range (EPA) - Range (EPA) 205 mi
Range (WLTP) 261 mi - Range (WLTP)
Range (GCC) 222 mi 195 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 62 kWh 66 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 60.4 kWh 63 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 27.2 kWh/100 mi 32.3 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 3.68 mi/kWh 3.1 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 6.5 5

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 130 kW, while the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) maxes out at 110 kW.

The BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is limited to 7.2 kW.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 7.2 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 110 kW 130 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 CCS Type 1
Charging Score 4.9 4.6

Performance

The BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is front-wheel drive, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Drive Type FWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM EESM (front), EESM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 150 kW 250 kW
Motor Power (hp) 201 hp 335 hp
Motor Torque 229 lb-ft 413 lb-ft
0-60 mph 7 s 5.1 s
Top Speed 99 mph 124 mph
Performance Score 3.5 5.2

Dimensions

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…).

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Length 175.4 in 180.9 in
Width (with Mirrors) 80.7 in 85.5 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 73.8 in 72.8 in
Height 63.6 in 65.4 in
Wheelbase 107.1 in 109.3 in

Cargo and Towing

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a towing capacity of up to 1500 lb, whereas the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.

Property BYD Atto 3 FWD Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 3858 lb 4608 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 15.5 ft3 22.8 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 47.3 ft3 59.7 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity 1500 lb
Cargo and Towing Score 5.9 6.8
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared