USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model S 60

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) for as low as $5999, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) is a Liftback.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Years of Production 2019-2023 2013-2015
Current Status Discontinued Discontinued
Country of Manufacture Germany, China Netherlands, USA
Body Style SUV Liftback
Market Availability EU EU, USA
Price USA (Used) - Price USA (Used) $5999
GCC Score 6.3 5.8

Range and Efficiency

While the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015).

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Range (EPA) - Range (EPA) 208 mi
Range (WLTP) 268 mi - Range (WLTP)
Range (GCC) 226 mi 186 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 85 kWh 61 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 80 kWh 58.5 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 35.4 kWh/100 mi 31.5 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 2.83 mi/kWh 3.18 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5 5.1

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 10 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Max Charging Power (AC) 9.6 kW 10 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 112 kW 120 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 Tesla (NACS)
Charging Score 5.8 5.5

Performance

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Drive Type AWD RWD
Motor Type IM (front), IM (rear) IM
Motor Power (kW) 300 kW 225 kW
Motor Power (hp) 402 hp 302 hp
Motor Torque 561 lb-ft 317 lb-ft
0-60 mph 4.9 s 5.9 s
Top Speed 112 mph 120 mph
Performance Score 5.7 4.7

Dimensions

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Length 187.5 in 195.7 in
Width (with Mirrors) 82.5 in 86.2 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 74.2 in 77.3 in
Height 63.9 in 56.9 in
Wheelbase 113.1 in 116.5 in

Cargo and Towing

The Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 60 (2013-2015), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.

Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 60
Number of Seats 5 5, 7
Curb Weight 5500 lb 4407 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 17.7 ft3 26.3 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 51.6 ft3 58.1 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 2.1 ft3
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity
Cargo and Towing Score 6.9 5.5
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared