USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC vs Volvo ES90 Twin Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of $85900. The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production.
The Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) is a Sedan, whereas the Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Announced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | China |
| Body Style | Sedan | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | $85900 | $78000 |
| Price USA (Used) | $39000 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 298 mi | 370 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 385 mi | 435 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 304 mi | 360 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 100 kWh | 106 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 90.6 kWh | 102 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 29.8 kWh/100 mi | 28.3 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.36 mi/kWh | 3.53 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.7 | 8.8 |
Charging
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) features an advanced 800-volt architecture, whereas the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 350 kW, while the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) maxes out at 170 kW.
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 170 kW | 350 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 800 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.6 | 8.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Although the Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) has more power, the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 330 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 449 hp |
| Motor Torque | 633 lb-ft | 494 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5 s | 5.3 s |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 112 mph |
| Performance Score | 6.3 | 5.5 |
Dimensions
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.7 in | 196.9 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.8 in | 83.5 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 75 in | 76.5 in |
| Height | 59.2 in | 60.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 122.8 in | 122.1 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…), but the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo ES90 Twin Motor (2025-…) has a towing capacity of up to 4409 lb, whereas the Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2022-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 5445 lb | 5628 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 15.2 ft3 | 15.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 31.6 ft3 | 44.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 0.8 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 4409 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.5 | 6.2 |