USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQT Long vs Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | France | UK |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Range and Efficiency
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 165 mi | 214 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 141 mi | 183 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 48 kWh | 52 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 45 kWh | 50 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 31.9 kWh/100 mi | 27.3 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.13 mi/kWh | 3.66 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.4 | 5.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 7.4 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 80 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 4.3 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 90 kW | 100 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 121 hp | 134 hp |
| Motor Torque | 181 lb-ft | 199 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 12.8 s | 11.3 s |
| Top Speed | 82 mph | 82 mph |
| Performance Score | 1.8 | 2.2 |
Dimensions
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) stretches out longer, while the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) compensates with a wider stance. As for height, they’re nearly identical, so headroom should be comparable.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 193.8 in | 173.3 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 85 in | 83 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 73.2 in | 75.6 in |
| Height | 71.3 in | 71.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 122 in | 109.6 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4286 lb | 4034 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 29.2 ft3 | 27.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 105.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 3307 lb | 1653 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.6 | 7.6 |
