USA EV Comparison: Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS vs Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production. The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a starting price of $43590, while the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) is not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2021-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Czech Republic | Japan, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | USA |
| Price USA (New) | - Price USA (New) | $43590 |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $18500 |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 5.6 |
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…).
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 205 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 353 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 304 mi | 195 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 84 kWh | 66 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 79 kWh | 63 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26 kWh/100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.85 mi/kWh | 3.1 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 8.5 | 5 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 185 kW, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) maxes out at 130 kW.
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 7.2 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 185 kW | 130 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.8 | 4.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), PMSM (rear) | EESM (front), EESM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 250 kW | 250 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 335 hp | 335 hp |
| Motor Torque | 501 lb-ft | 413 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 124 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Dimensions
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 183.5 in | 180.9 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 84.6 in | 85.5 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 74 in | 72.8 in |
| Height | 63.3 in | 65.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 109 in | 109.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2025-...) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…).
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS | Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4936 lb | 4608 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 20.1 ft3 | 22.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 56.9 ft3 | 59.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 2645 lb | 1500 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 6.8 |
