USA EV Comparison: Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Announced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 373 mi | 264 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 317 mi | 227 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 77 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 69.3 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.9 kWh/100 mi | 29.5 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.57 mi/kWh | 3.39 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.5 | 6.2 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Tesla (NACS) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.4 | 6.1 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-60 mph acceleration time, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 165 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 221 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 221 lb-ft | 243 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a longer body, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) stands taller, offering a more elevated ride. Their widths are almost identical, so both offer a similar amount of shoulder room.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 178 in | 174.2 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 80.1 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 73.6 in | 73.7 in |
| Height | 62.8 in | 65 in |
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 106.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has a towing capacity of up to 2000 lb, whereas the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | - Curb Weight | 4475 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 14.7 ft3 | 16 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 57.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.1 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 2000 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 6.7 |
