Global EV Comparison: Mini Aceman JCW vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €43150. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €30890 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €43150 | - Price Europe (New) |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €30890 |
| GCC Score | 5.8 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…).
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 355 km | 425 km |
| Range (GCC) | 306 km | 366 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 54.2 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 49.2 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 6.22 km/kWh | 5.46 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 150 kW, while the Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…) maxes out at 95 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 95 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.5 | 6.1 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 190 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 255 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 350 Nm | 330 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 4.3 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4079 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 1991 mm | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1754 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1514 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2606 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Mini Aceman JCW (2024-…).
| Property | Mini Aceman JCW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 1825 kg | 2030 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 300 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1005 l | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.3 | 6.7 |
