Škoda Citigo-e iV vs Tesla Model S 90D
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) for as low as €10990, while the Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) begins at €26900.
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is a Hatchback, whereas the Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) is a Liftback.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2021 | 2016-2017 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Slovakia | Netherlands, USA |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | €10990 | €26900 |
| GCC Score | 4.5 | 6.7 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021).
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 473 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 257 km | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 218 km | 434 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 36.8 kWh | 90 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 32.3 kWh | 85.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 19.7 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 6.75 km/kWh | 5.08 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6 | 6.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) maxes out at 40 kW.
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 40 kW | 120 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes) |
| Charging Score | 3.9 | 6.5 |
Performance
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is front-wheel drive, while the Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 61 kW | 311 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 82 hp | 417 hp |
| Motor Torque | 212 Nm | 660 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 12.3 s | 4.4 s |
| Top Speed | 130 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.7 | 6.3 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) is longer and wider, but the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is taller.
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3597 mm | 4970 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2189 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1645 mm | 1964 mm |
| Height | 1481 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2422 mm | 2960 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 90D (2016-2017), but the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in in the EU.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Tesla Model S 90D |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 5, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 1235 kg | 2148 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 250 l | 745 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 923 l | 1645 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 60 l |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 3.6 | 5.5 |
