Global EV Comparison: Tesla Model S 60D vs Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) for as low as €32890, while the Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) was never offered for sale in Europe.
The Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) is a Liftback, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV.
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2016-2017 | 2019-2023 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Netherlands, USA | Germany, China |
| Body Style | Liftback | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €32890 |
| GCC Score | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017).
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 351 km | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 432 km |
| Range (GCC) | 320 km | 364 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 75 kWh | 85 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 62 kWh | 80 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | 22 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.16 km/kWh | 4.55 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.4 | 5 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 120 kW | 112 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.2 | 5.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), IM (rear) | IM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 245 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 329 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 525 Nm | 760 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 5.3 | 5.7 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.
The Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4970 mm | 4762 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2189 mm | 2096 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1964 mm | 1884 mm |
| Height | 1445 mm | 1624 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2960 mm | 2873 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a towing capacity of up to 1800 kg, whereas the Tesla Model S 60D (2016-2017) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.
| Property | Tesla Model S 60D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5, 7 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2108 kg | 2495 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 745 l | 500 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1645 l | 1460 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 60 l | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 1800 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.5 | 7 |
