Global EV Comparison: Tesla Model X P90D vs Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) for as low as €37900, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) begins at €32890.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2016-2016 | 2019-2023 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Netherlands, USA | Germany, China |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price Europe (Used) | €37900 | €32890 |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 402 km | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 432 km |
| Range (GCC) | 366 km | 364 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 90 kWh | 85 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 85.5 kWh | 80 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 23.4 kWh/100 km | 22 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.28 km/kWh | 4.55 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.7 | 5.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 120 kW | 112 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.5 | 5.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), IM (rear) | IM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 345 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 463 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 967 Nm | 760 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 4 s | 5.1 s |
| Top Speed | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 7 | 5.7 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5052 mm | 4762 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2271 mm | 2096 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1999 mm | 1884 mm |
| Height | 1684 mm | 1624 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2873 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) features a larger trunk, but the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model X P90D (2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Tesla Model X P90D | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5, 6, 7 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2514 kg | 2495 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 357 l | 500 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 2431 l | 1460 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 187 l | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 2250 kg | 1800 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 8.9 | 7 |
