Global EV Comparison: Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD vs Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Although the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has been announced, it is not yet in production and will not be available for sale in Europe. The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €31590 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2021-2022 |
| Current Status | Announced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €31590 |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 600 km | 438 km |
| Range (GCC) | 510 km | 373 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 77 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 69.3 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 13.6 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.36 km/kWh | 5.57 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.6 | 6.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.4 | 6.2 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 165 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 221 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 300 Nm | 330 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) and Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) are about the same size.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4520 mm | 4440 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1870 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1595 mm | 1596 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022), but the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | - Curb Weight | 1970 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 416 l | 404 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1205 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 6.4 |
