Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model S P90D
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) for as low as €32890, while the Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) begins at €28500.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2023 | 2016-2017 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Netherlands, USA |
| Body Style | SUV | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | €32890 | €28500 |
| GCC Score | 6.3 | 6.7 |
Range and Efficiency
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 435 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 432 km | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 364 km | 398 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 85 kWh | 90 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 80 kWh | 85.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 22 kWh/100 km | 21.5 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.55 km/kWh | 4.65 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 5.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 112 kW | 120 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes) |
| Charging Score | 5.8 | 6.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), IM (rear) | PMSM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 515 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 691 hp |
| Motor Torque | 760 Nm | 930 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1 s | 3.3 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Performance Score | 5.7 | 7.6 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4762 mm | 4970 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2096 mm | 2189 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1884 mm | 1964 mm |
| Height | 1624 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2873 mm | 2960 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a towing capacity of up to 1800 kg, whereas the Tesla Model S P90D (2016-2017) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model S P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 2495 kg | 2196 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 500 l | 745 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1460 l | 1645 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 60 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1800 kg | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 5.5 |
