Global EV Comparison: Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD vs BYD Atto 3 FWD

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production. The BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) has a starting price of , while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is not sold in Europe.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Years of Production 2021-… 2022-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture Japan, China China
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability USA EU
Price Europe (Used) - Price Europe (Used) €26985
GCC Score 5.6 5.4

Range and Efficiency

Even though the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a larger battery, the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Range (EPA) 330 km - Range (EPA)
Range (WLTP) - Range (WLTP) 420 km
Range (GCC) 314 km 357 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 66 kWh 62 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 63 kWh 60.4 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 20.1 kWh/100 km 16.9 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.98 km/kWh 5.91 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5 6.5

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 130 kW, while the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) maxes out at 110 kW.

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 7.2 kW, whereas the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is limited to 7 kW.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Max Charging Power (AC) 7.2 kW 7 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 130 kW 110 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 1 CCS Type 2
Charging Score 4.6 4.9

Performance

The BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is front-wheel drive, while the Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Drive Type AWD FWD
Motor Type EESM (front), EESM (rear) PMSM
Motor Power (kW) 250 kW 150 kW
Motor Power (hp) 335 hp 201 hp
Motor Torque 560 Nm 310 Nm
0-100 km/h 5.9 s 7.3 s
Top Speed 200 km/h 160 km/h
Performance Score 5.2 3.5

Dimensions

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…).

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Length 4595 mm 4455 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2172 mm 2050 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1850 mm 1875 mm
Height 1660 mm 1615 mm
Wheelbase 2775 mm 2720 mm

Cargo and Towing

The BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).

The Nissan Ariya 63 kWh e-4ORCE AWD (2021-…) has a towing capacity of up to 1500 kg, whereas the BYD Atto 3 FWD (2022-…) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.

Property Nissan Ariya 63 kWh AWD BYD Atto 3 FWD
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 2090 kg 1750 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 408 l 440 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1280 l 1338 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity 1500 kg - Towing Capacity
Cargo and Towing Score 6.8 5.9
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared