Global EV Comparison: Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) has a starting price of , compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…), which starts at €59590.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-… | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €59590 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €53980 | €36200 |
| GCC Score | 6.5 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 438 km | 409 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 507 km | 539 km |
| Range (GCC) | 432 km | 428 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 91 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 87 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 20.1 kWh/100 km | 18.5 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.97 km/kWh | 5.42 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.5 | 6.9 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 200 kW, while the Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) maxes out at 130 kW.
The Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 130 kW | 200 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | EESM (front), EESM (rear) | IM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 290 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 389 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 600 Nm | 670 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 5.5 | 5.6 |
Dimensions
The Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…).
The Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4595 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2172 mm | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1850 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2775 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…), but the Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Nissan Ariya 87 kWh e-4ORCE AWD 290 kW (2023-…).
| Property | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh AWD 290 kW | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2259 kg | 2170 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 408 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1280 l | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 1800 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.8 | 6.7 |
