Global EV Comparison: Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh vs Mercedes EQT Long
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) has a starting price of €38440, compared to the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…), which starts at €41613.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | UK | France |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €38440 | €41613 |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Range and Efficiency
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 345 km | 266 km |
| Range (GCC) | 294 km | 227 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 52 kWh | 48 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 50 kWh | 45 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | 19.8 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.88 km/kWh | 5.04 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.8 | 4.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 100 kW | 80 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4.3 | 6.7 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 100 kW | 90 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 134 hp | 121 hp |
| Motor Torque | 270 Nm | 245 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 11.7 s | 13.3 s |
| Top Speed | 132 km/h | 132 km/h |
| Performance Score | 2.2 | 1.8 |
Dimensions
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) stretches out longer, while the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...) compensates with a wider stance. As for height, they’re nearly identical, so headroom should be comparable.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4403 mm | 4922 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2107 mm | 2159 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1921 mm | 1859 mm |
| Height | 1818 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 3100 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh (2024-...).
| Property | Peugeot e-Rifter M 50 kWh | Mercedes EQT Long |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Curb Weight | 1830 kg | 1944 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 775 l | 828 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 3000 l | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.6 | 7.6 |
